Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make it easy to see what groups have requested a meeting session at an upcoming IETF while that information is being collected #710

Closed
ietf-svn-bot opened this issue Oct 13, 2011 · 9 comments

Comments

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link

keyword_sprint owner:adam@nostrum.com resolution_fixed type_enhancement | by rjsparks@nostrum.com


The database collects the set of requests for meeting sessions as input into the agenda that's prepared for each IETF meeting. It would be useful to expose this information in an easy to find place. (Perhaps the place where the agenda will eventually appear could point to that place).

The summary should be easy to see which groups have requested a session (and the duration requested), which groups have explicitly indicated they won't meet, and which groups have provided no input yet.

It should be possible to see the full meeting request, including the conflict lists and special requirements, for each group that has requested a session.

It would be nice if this page showed IRTF as well as IETF groups.


Issue migrated from trac:710 at 2022-03-04 01:53:45 +0000

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed priority from medium to major

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@rjsparks@nostrum.com commented


Bumping this to major so we at least talk about it as a group at the Paris codesprint

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed owner from `` to adam@nostrum.com

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@rjsparks@nostrum.com commented


This looks like it's been finished (see http://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/84/requests).
Should it be marked done and deployed?

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@rjsparks@nostrum.com commented


Nope - adam found a bug - the current page is showing reverse conflicts instead of conflicts. When that gets fixed the commit should note that it addresses this ticket.

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@adam@nostrum.com changed status from new to closed

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@adam@nostrum.com changed resolution from `` to fixed

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@adam@nostrum.com edited the issue description

@ietf-svn-bot
Copy link
Author

@adam@nostrum.com commented


Yeah, we appear to have fixed the "conflicts are backwards" problem a while back, but forgot to close this bug. Now we just need to figure out how to advertise the page more effectively.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 18, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant