* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Ticket #107 (closed design: wontfix)

Opened 8 years ago

Last modified 6 years ago

Alignment of LM and ETag validation

Reported by: mnot@pobox.com Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone: unassigned
Component: p4-conditional Severity: Active WG Document
Keywords: Cc:
Origin: http://www.w3.org/mid/5BFAE5F2-0D0C-4C5C-99B4-714BE0E63908@mnot.net


Last-Modified validation is defined in terms of 'requested variant', whereas ETag validation (If-Match, If-None-Match) seem to go out of their way to say that *any* entity that meets the conditional can be returned, and never mind the selecting headers. I'd be interested in hearing if any implementations actually do that, and unless some are found, I'd suggest we need to tighten up how ETag validation is defined.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by mnot@pobox.com

  • Priority set to normal
  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to wontfix
  • Severity set to Active WG Document

Understood and intentional difference.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.