* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Ticket #137 (closed editorial: incorporated)

Opened 6 years ago

Last modified 2 years ago

duplicate ABNF for Reason-Phrase

Reported by: julian.reschke@gmx.de Owned by: julian.reschke@gmx.de
Priority: normal Milestone: 13
Component: p2-semantics Severity: Active WG Document
Keywords: Cc:
Origin:

Description

The ABNF for Reason-Phrase currently appears both in P1 and P2.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

The same applies to Status-Code.

Both need to be defined in Part 1 so that generic message parsing is specified.

Should we remove the grammar from Part 2? Note that the definitions for Reason-Phrase are identical, while Status-Code differs in that Part 2 enumerates the codes defined in the spec. It seems to me that we should get rid of that enumeration and just say "3DIGIT" in the grammar.

comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

  • Owner set to julian.reschke@gmx.de
  • Priority set to normal
  • Milestone changed from unassigned to 13

comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

From [1124]:

Restructure 'Status Code and Reason Phrase', replace ABNF listing all HTTP/1.1 status codes with an Overview table, remove some redundant text (see #137)

comment:4 Changed 3 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to incorporated

comment:5 Changed 3 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

From [1137]:

apply editorial improvements suggested by Ben Niven-Jenkins in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2011JanMar/0164.html>, also avoid the word "required" when it's not a keyword (see #137)

comment:6 Changed 2 years ago by mnot@pobox.com

  • Severity changed from Candidate WG Document to Active WG Document
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.