* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Ticket #164 (closed editorial: fixed)

Opened 5 years ago

Last modified 2 years ago

status codes vs methods

Reported by: julian.reschke@gmx.de Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone: unassigned
Component: p2-semantics Severity: Active WG Document
Keywords: Cc:
Origin: http://www.w3.org/mid/23448293.post@talk.nabble.com

Description

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-06#section-8 says

"Each Status-Code is described below, _including a description of which method(s)_ it can follow and any metainformation required in the response."

but doesn't actually name the methods.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to fixed

Fixed in [579]:

Resolve #164: remove claim that we're listing applicable methods for each status code (closes #164)

comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by mnot@pobox.com

  • Priority set to normal
  • Severity changed from Candidate WG Document to Active WG Document
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.