Ticket #167 (closed design: fixed)
Content-Location on 304 responses
|Reported by:||email@example.com||Owned by:||firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Component:||p6-cache||Severity:||Active WG Document|
p6 section 2.2 para 5 says
If the server responds with 304 (Not Modified) and includes an entity tag or Content-Location that indicates the entity to be used
I.e., a Content-Location can be used in a 304 response to identify the cached response to use.
Is this implemented anywhere, and is it an appropriate use of C-L? If not (on either count), should we just remove this language?
- Status changed from new to closed
- Resolution set to fixed