* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Ticket #208 (closed design: fixed)

Opened 5 years ago

Last modified 3 years ago

IANA registry for cache-control directives

Reported by: julian.reschke@gmx.de Owned by: julian.reschke@gmx.de
Priority: normal Milestone: 10
Component: p6-cache Severity: Active WG Document
Keywords: Cc:
Origin:

Description

Add a IANA registry for cache-control directives.

Proposal: as with other HTTP related registries, make it "specification required"

Change History

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

Actually, the other registry procedures require "IETF review", so be consistent with *that*.

comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

From [817]:

Add IANA registry for cache directives (related to #208)

comment:3 follow-up: ↓ 4 Changed 5 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

We still need to figure out how to get RFC 5861's extensions into the registry.

comment:4 in reply to: ↑ 3 Changed 5 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

Replying to julian.reschke@…:

We still need to figure out how to get RFC 5861's extensions into the registry.

Proposal: as long as there's only one affected spec (5861) (and that spec happens to be written by our chair), the simplest thing to do is just to send a registration request to IANA once the registry is up.

We may reconsider this if more cache directive definitions are published before we are done.

comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by mnot@pobox.com

I know we've talked about this on the phone before, but I forget -- did we just consider adding 5861's registrations to the IANA Considerations section here, but not listing them elsewhere?

comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

From [825]:

Add RFC 5861 cache directives to IANA instructions (see #208)

comment:7 Changed 4 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to incorporated

comment:8 Changed 4 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

  • Milestone changed from unassigned to 10

comment:9 Changed 4 years ago by mnot@pobox.com

  • Status changed from closed to reopened
  • Resolution incorporated deleted

comment:10 Changed 4 years ago by mnot@pobox.com

  • Status changed from reopened to closed
  • Resolution set to fixed

comment:11 Changed 3 years ago by mnot@pobox.com

  • Severity changed from Candidate WG Document to Active WG Document
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.