* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Ticket #253 (closed editorial: fixed)

Opened 4 years ago

Last modified 4 years ago

clarify what LWS means for the Content-Disp grammar

Reported by: julian.reschke@gmx.de Owned by: julian.reschke@gmx.de
Priority: normal Milestone: unassigned
Component: content-disp Severity: Active WG Document
Keywords: Cc:
Origin:

Description

We do say that we use RFC 2616's ABNF syntax, but we should make it clearer what that means for the content-disposition syntax.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

  • Summary changed from clarity what LWS means for the Content-Disp grammar to clarify what LWS means for the Content-Disp grammar

comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

  • Owner set to julian.reschke@gmx.de

comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

From [1060]:

Add more prose about implied LWS, also include quoted-string into the ABNF, and explain that value is "token | quoted-string" (see #253)

comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to incorporated

comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by mnot@pobox.com

  • Status changed from closed to reopened
  • Resolution incorporated deleted

comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by mnot@pobox.com

  • Status changed from reopened to closed
  • Resolution set to fixed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.