* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Ticket #260 (closed design: wontfix)

Opened 5 years ago

Last modified 5 years ago

Multiple Disposition types

Reported by: mnot@pobox.com Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone: unassigned
Component: content-disp Severity: In WG Last Call
Keywords: Cc:
Origin: http://www.w3.org/mid/AANLkTin2KkDJyMpdw0BwkPG4iVwSfzJ1bipC3qKHpa70@mail.gmail.com



This section does not define how user agents ought to process header field values with multiple disposition types. According to this test case <http://greenbytes.de/tech/tc2231/#attandinline2>, user agents MUST use the first disposition type.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

The argument is flawed. <http://greenbytes.de/tech/tc2231/#attandinline> demonstrates that IE picks the type by name, not by position.

There is no interoperability here today, and there's no evidence yet that it is needed. After all, the header is invalid.

Proposal: close as WONTFIX.

comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to wontfix
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.