Ticket #323 (closed editorial: incorporated)
intended maturity level vs normative references
|Reported by:||firstname.lastname@example.org||Owned by:|
|Component:||non-specific||Severity:||Active WG Document|
The working assumption for a long time was that we recycle at Draft standard. That standards level is gone, and for going to Full Standard, we probably changed too much.
This leaves us with the option to go "back" to Proposed (*), in which case we can remove the prose in the Normative References about downrefs to other specs at Proposed level (namely, RFCs 1950..2).
(*) In which case we should plan to go to full standard as soon as possible afterwards.