* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Ticket #323 (closed editorial: incorporated)

Opened 3 years ago

Last modified 3 years ago

intended maturity level vs normative references

Reported by: julian.reschke@gmx.de Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone: 18
Component: non-specific Severity: Active WG Document
Keywords: Cc:
Origin:

Description

The working assumption for a long time was that we recycle at Draft standard. That standards level is gone, and for going to Full Standard, we probably changed too much.

This leaves us with the option to go "back" to Proposed (*), in which case we can remove the prose in the Normative References about downrefs to other specs at Proposed level (namely, RFCs 1950..2).

(*) In which case we should plan to go to full standard as soon as possible afterwards.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by mnot@pobox.com

  • Type changed from design to editorial

At this point, it looks like we need to go Proposed; flipping to editorial.

comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

From [1477]:

Target maturity level is 'proposed', no need to discuss RFC1950-2 as downrefs (see #323)

comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to incorporated
  • Milestone changed from unassigned to 18
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.