* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Ticket #112 (closed defect: fixed)

Opened 3 years ago

Last modified 23 months ago

Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison

Reported by: masinter@adobe.com Owned by: draft-ietf-iri-comparison@tools.ietf.org
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: comparison Version:
Severity: - Keywords:
Cc:

Description

RFC 3986 on URIs contains the "ladder" for comparison which was the source of iri-comparison. The iri-comparison document makes mainly editorial but perhaps normative definitions for comparison which might supercede, so perhaps iri-comparison should 'UPDATE' 3986.
Opinions?

Change History

comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by masinter@adobe.com

Alternatively? Consider making this document BCP rather than standards track, since it basically gives guidance for protocols and applications needing equivalence, and doesn't directly have a scope of application?
(I'm putting this comment in for completeness since it was in iri-comparison, but I don't think this is such a great idea ...)

comment:2 Changed 23 months ago by masinter@adobe.com

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to fixed

draft-ietf-iri-comparison now says it "updates" 3986.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.