* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Ticket #22 (closed defect: fixed)

Opened 5 years ago

Last modified 3 years ago

Fix "IRIs as identity tokens MUST"

Reported by: duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp Owned by: masinter@adobe.com
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: comparison Version:
Severity: - Keywords:


This is issue http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/#identity-101 from the old issues list. This issue is originally from Roy Fielding, see http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg12903.html

Change History

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp

  • Owner set to masinter@adobe.com

From editorial meeting 2010-09-28:

Ticket #22: Fix "IRIs as identity tokens MUST"

Larry: the MUST requirement doesn't make a lot of sense to me, I think it's a best practice or guideline

Larry: also not well-defined what is an "identity token"

Martin: this matters for XML namespaces and RDF

Martin: agreed that phrasing this as a MUST is not the right approach

Larry: tradeoff between wanting something smarter than Simple String Comparison and using different algorithms for different protocols (security problems here) -- slippery slope of how "smart" comparison will be

Larry: let's try to capture a guideline that using the simplest method possible is best

Marc: [not captured]

Addison: [not captured]

Marc: we can't define default normalization?

Larry: problem is knowing when to stop

Addison: comparison is application-specific

Marc: perhaps different templates that different application protocols can choose from

Martin: we can look if we want to go in that direction, but a lot of work

Martin: I think we need to propose some text on this point

Larry volunteers

ACTION ITEM: Larry to propose text on the list

comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp

  • Component changed from 3987bis to comparison

comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by masinter@adobe.com

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to fixed

The MUST wording disappeared several versions ago. It just says

Some applications (such as XML namespaces) use IRIs as identity
tokens without any relationship to acessing the resources. Those
applications use the Simple String Comparison (see Section 4.1).

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.